Friday, February 13, 2009

S*cks to Be Me (#2) -- The Mail

Hello, Everyone,

So, as you know, I’m in the middle of an ongoing series regarding my happy experiences during the last couple of months of 2008 . . . those care free days when Geo-W. was still in the White House, the economy was melting down to a puddle of radioactive sludge, suicide bombers continued to blow themselves up in Iraq, the Taliban was preparing to take over Afghanistan, and…oh, yes!... mega-rich mega-brokers on Wall Street were complaining bitterly that they couldn’t possibly get along on a mere half million dollars a year.

Ah, good times . . .

But, this series is not about all those big national things. This series deal with my own PERSONAL experiences during those giddy days of wine and roses.

Last we left off, I’d just found out that a psychotic killer cyborg-qua-lobotomist from the future was going to jam an ice pick into my left eye. While giggling. And humming Barry Manilow tunes.

It’s the Manilow that hurts.

*

Well, actually, that wasn’t what I’d found out. I actually learned that I had to have cataract surgery. Which, these days, is an outpatient procedure that’s actually less painful than having your teeth cleaned. Well, maybe with a sandblaster. But, the point is, ‘taint that bad.

Except, of course, as I explained last time I have … issues …with eye surgery and I came home from my exam with a mild case of shock. Very mild. Oh, so mild. Oh, so very, Very VERY mild. You betcha. And the occasional fits of hysterical screaming? Heck. Lots of people get those. Particularly in Boston traffic. So, I fit right in.

Anyway, I got home and figured that heck, golly, gee . . . at least the day couldn’t get worse. Right? Not possible. Of course. So I parked the car and wobbled up the front walk. And if my knees buckled now and then and I almost collided with the rhododendron out front, well, fortunately we have no fault insurance. And besides, the plant should have seen me coming. And where the heck was its turn signal? That’s what I want to know.

Anyway, I got to the door and there . . .there . . .

There…

Was the mail box.

*

It was big. And sinister. And ominous. It was stuffed with . . . things. Bills. And junk mail. And credit card offers. And You-May-Have-Already-Wons. And solicitations from guilt-tripping social causes—“At this very moment Baby Seals and Easter Bunnies are being eviscerated by Dick Cheney and former Enron employees and you’re just sitting there and letting them do it (You Bastard.)”

And . . . one more thing.

A letter.

From a University.


*

Now, in another Xcargo column, I have already described my adventures in graduate school. So, today, I’ll just provide the quickest overview of the whole business for those who, alas, may have missed my deathless prose on same.

Suffice to say that, some years ago, I decided to go back to school and get a Ph.D. in history. Don’t ask me why. I think it had something to do with masochism. Or maybe it was an LSD flashback from all that Acid I dropped in the sixties. Except, oh, wait, I was 11 in 1968. And I never dropped any Acid. And if I had, I’d have picked it up and carefully put it in the trashcan. Like the good Cub Scout I was. Keep America Beautiful.

So…

Anyway, I went back to school. I was in a program at a certain University that shall remain nameless. I won’t tell you which one. No sir. I’m way too moral for that. You bet. Besides, I wanna have a lawyer on call first. Never can tell.

I will tell you that it’s a college about sixty miles from where I live. It’s roughly halfway between the Big Important Schools in the Boston-Cambridge area and the Big Important Schools in the Amherst-Northampton area.

This particular school would like to be a Big Important School too. And in a couple of disciplines, it is or will be one soon. Its departments of Education and Geography are world-class. And it has something called a Center “For Holocaust Studies.” No. Really. There is such a thing. And this school does it well.

But, then, there’s the college’s Department in History. And that Department is …

Ah…

Er…

It definitely is. No doubt about that.


*

Anyway, while I was that this School I had to have a committee of three professors to oversee my dissertation. At first, I thought of them as being wise, insightful, and kind. And, I’m sure, that they really are all those things. Not to mention very, very Scholarly. And Professional. And Insightful. It says so. Right on their box. And by their own admission. Quite loudly stated. And re-stated. Again and again and again. So it has to be true. Doesn’t it?

And besides, if, with the passage of time, I came to call them “Larry, Moe, and Curly,” “Tweedledee, Tweedledumb, Tweedle-dork,” and, of course, “The Hood, the Blob, and the Ugly,” well, then, those were just the affectionate little pet names that a student brings to those of his mentors he truly admires.

*

And, so, as I glanced at my mailbox I discovered…right there, between the Visa bill and the Cable ad (“Sign Up Today and Get Our Gratuitous and Excessive Violence Channel For Free!”) . . . was a letter from My School!

Far out!

You see, I’d been having this wee little problem with my School and my Three Professors. Specifically, I would send them chapters from my dissertation and then . . . weeks would pass. Or months. And I’d not hear so much as a word. My emails would go unanswered. My phone calls would go un-returned. I’d thought about trying carrier pigeons, but I couldn’t fit the coop on the roof. And the neighbors kept complaining about the large mounds of guano on the front porch. Which is surprising. Cause you can sell that stuff. Fifty cents a ton. Great source of nitrogen. Could have been a valuable source of income for the Neighborhood Association. And, besides, it wasn’t nearly as messy as the time I had the Bat Ranch in the Basement.

Anyway, two months before, I’d sent them a completed first draft of my dissertation. But, I hadn’t had any response. I had sent them multiple emails and asked about it. But, I’d only gotten a couple of mysterious notes about maybe they’d get around to reading my material after Thanksgiving. Or just as soon as hell froze over. Which ever came first.

So, I was really kind of excited to see that envelop sitting there. I unlocked the door, hurried inside, opened the letter, and …

…learned that my professors were refusing to work with me any longer.

*

I’ll spare you the exact text of the letter. Suffice to say that there was an informational component and an emotional, unstated component.

The informational component was that two of the professors had decided that I was impossible to work with and they would therefore have nothing to do with me ever again.

The emotional component . . . well, that was much more subtle, more complex, more cryptic. But, I think if the text were subjected to rigorous analysis and learned deconstructive review, it would boil down to: “You’re ugly, and your mother dresses you funny.”

Don’t you just love rational deconstructive analysis?


*

In retrospect, I have to admit that it was really rather clever of them. In effect, they forced me out of the program without ever actually having to confront me about it. After all, they could say, I could always find other professors willing to serve on my committee.

Except, the Department is tiny. There weren’t a lot of people to work with. And besides, even if I found a new committee, it would mean starting all over again. It would be years before I finished the research, much less started writing. And, even then, what chance did I have of getting the dissertation accepted when three of the department’s leading lights (including the Chair) had already told me to go suck an egg?

So . . . not to put too fine a point on it … and applying rigorous analytical techniques . . . I concluded …

I was screwed.

*


Actually, I suppose, they didn’t do that much harm. They denied me the doctorate, but, quite simply, I’m not sure that having it would have bought me much. Yes, not having a Ph.D. means I’ll never teach at a Big University and be “Tenure Track.”

But, let’s face it, that wasn’t going to happen anyway. I’ve done a little research and it turns out that of all the major professions, the Academy is the most “ageist.” That is, if you’re middle aged or older, you don’t get a job. Period.

I’m fifty-one.

Then, too, there are not that many jobs out there to get. When I decided to go back to school, everyone said, “Do it! Because all those Baby Boomers are going to retire soon! There’ll be lots ‘o slots open.”

Except . . . guess what? The Boomers can’t afford to retire. So they’ll be there ‘till they rot. And, besides, even if they do quietly pop off to ye ole’ happy hunting grounds of rigor and scholarship, their former positions are not being refilled. The economy is so f*cked up at the moment, and there are so many adjunct faculty members willing to teach for peanuts, that when some Tenured Tracker goes away, most often his/her fulltime job goes away too.

And, finally, you don’t really need a Ph.D. to teach in some places. Community colleges, departments of continuing education, private high schools . . . these are quite happy with the Master’s. In fact, I’m teaching a couple of college classes right now. No body seems to mind that I’m not Doctor Mike.

*

Still…

Still…

It hurt. A lot.


*

I was pretty good with it for the first couple of hours. “Well, at least that’s over,” I said to myself. No more fighting to get even the slightest hint of a response from the Three Stooges. No more grinding my teeth when they did bother to reply, usually with fairly overt insults.

My wife, Martha, got home. I showed her the letter. I said I was fine with it and everything.

“Uh-huh,” she said.

We went to bed. I told her again about how peaceful I felt. “I’ll probably sleep better than I have in months,” I said.

“Uh-huh,” she added.

I put my head on the pillow. Right, I said. I’ll sleep better than I have in ages. Sure. Absolutely. 100%.

*

Amazing what you can find on TV at three in the morning. Did you know that for a low, low down payment of $26,170 you, too, can get a timeshare at Gator Swamp Spa and Resorts?

Comes with its own bug-zapper in the bedroom. And an elephant gun. For the extra big mosquitoes. During the off season.

*

It was about three days later that I finally went to sleep. At least for a while.

And it was about a month after that—just a little before Christmas—that I stopped waking up each night at around two and staring into the dark. For a couple of hours. Listening to Martha’s breathing, watching the green glow of the clock face, feeling eternity slip past, one moment at a time.


*

Ah well. Didn’t mind the insomnia, really. Gave me lots of time to plan out my new video game. “Godzilla Visits The Academy (And Goes Freaking Ballistic).”

Should finally give “Grand Theft Auto” a run for its money, you know?


*

But, anyway, like I said, in a couple of weeks I was getting better. I wasn’t exactly ALL better, and I was still having these embarrassing moments when I’d be found curled up in the fetal position under my desk, but …better.

And the reason? Because of logic. My precise, steely, geometric LOGIC.

My logic was as follows: I am going to have my eye gouged out and I’ve just been screwed out of four years of my professional life. So . . .

It’s gotta get better. Hasn’t it?

Right. Just has to.

And thinking thus, one Saturday morning shortly thereafter, I woke up in a cheery mood. It was a sunny day. I didn’t have to work. Yes, sir. A lovely day. And things were gonna be fine. Just you wait see. It was going to be all butterflies and warm fuzzy puppy dogs for a least a year.

So, I rolled out of bed with a smile on my face and a song in my heart.

And noticed there seemed to be icicles forming on my nostrils.

But that’s for next time.

*

Onward and upward.























Copyright © 2009 Michael Jay Tucker

Thursday, February 05, 2009

S*cks to Be Me (#1): The Eye

Hello, Everyone,

So, a few of you have asked “Where the ding-dong doodlewoops have you been these last few years and how come you haven’t had time to write Xcargo? I mean, would it kill you to call once in a while? Let us know if you’re alive or dead? I mean, REALLY.”

The answer to your question is simple. I’ve been busy. Very busy. VERY busy. As in oh-jeez-ya-gotta-be-kidding busy. As in, “Come on, I couldn’t make this stuff up” busy. Or, at least, couldn’t make it up unless I was on serious drugs while watching horror movie DVDs and juggling running chain saws and walking a tight rope. Over a blast furnace. Or Dick Cheney. Six of one…

Anyway, so just to bring you up to speed, and provide a little insight into my existence, I’ve decided to do a new series of columns that will relate the story of my life, and the lives of my loved ones, from November 2008 to New Year’s Day 2009.

I call it, “S*cks To Be Me,” and I’m hoping you’ll enjoy it as much as I didn’t.

It’ll give us yet another interest in common.


*

So, as I say this is my history of the last few months. Now, truth to be told, I may not get all the details right, but that’s ‘cause my brain is fried. But, not to worry, no trans-fats were harmed in the process.

Where was I? Oh, yes. So I hadn’t had an eye exam in a few years and I had noticed that my vision was getting a little worse. Probably needed new lenses, I said to myself. And, oh, by the way, I’ve been nearsighted since I was about six. My parents wondered if I might have a slight vision problem when I started walking into walls. But, of course, they couldn’t be certain because given a kid as spacey as I was, well, you know, walking into walls is par for the course. (THUMP. “Oh, he’s in the living room. Check the TV, would you?”)

So, anyway, I make an appointment to see (or, least, stare blearily at) my local optometrist. She has me sit down at look at one of those of little vision charts. “Okay, with just the right eye, read the lowest line you can see.”

“AQZIB.”

“Fine. Now the left eye.”

“F …I…R…E…E…X…I …T.”

“Uh, Mr. Tucker?”

“Yes?”

“That’s the sign over the door.”

“There’s a door?”


*

Then, after the exam, she said cheerily, “You have a cataract in your left eye that’s the size of dinner plate and could result in total blindness unless it is treated now.”

“Ack,” I said, wittily. “Erk,” I added, perceptively.

“So,” she continued, “what they’ll have to do is gash your eye open with a rusty fish knife, pop the old lens out with a grapefruit spoon, and stick in a coke bottle bottom as a replacement.”

Well, actually, that ISN’T what she said.

Actually, what she said was, “Cataract surgery these days is an outpatient procedure, totally painless, and then afterwards you’ll have nearly perfect vision in that eye.”

But, that’s not what I heard.

Still, as my former dissertation committee members said just before they threw me out of their Ph.D. program, reality is Socially Constructed and ergo in the eye of the beholder.

Or, in this case, the cataract.


*

I wobbled out of her office and into the lobby.

The Doctor, sensing (perhaps) my discomfort—maybe it was the fits of uncontrollable hysterical weeping, but you never can tell—followed me out and reassured me about the surgery and explained that her diagnosis really was great news because my insurance would pay for it all and afterwards I’d have things like depth perception. Which is a handy if you are, say, driving and you happen to discover (just a little too late) that the big blur to the left is actually a 16-wheeler hauling toxic waste, high explosives, radioactive isotopes, and several large crates of crazed attack gerbils. Who are grumpy. All at the same time.

Okay, I said, and started the process of making appointments. When all was said and done, I was set up to go on December 15.


*

I then headed for home—wrestling, as I went, with a major attack of sheer, unadulterated, super-charged, purified, new and improved . . . terror.

Here’s why. I have an interest in history. I’m not, according to my former dissertation committee, a Fer-Real historian. That requires a level of mental constipat…eh, that is, scholarship for which God or Nature did not prepare me.

But, I do have just enough knowledge of the past to be all too aware of what cataract surgery USED to be like.

Now, today, it really is an outpatient procedure. You go in. They sedate you. The doctor makes a micro-incision and performs the repair. Then, the incision closes up all by itself. When I had mine done, I was reading again that evening.

BUT, that’s today.

Not that long ago, it was quite a different story. And not a pretty one.

It used to be that cataract surgery was a major undertaking involving fun things like the total removal of lens in the eye, stitches in the eye itself, and, then, wearing huge glasses for the rest of your life. And you still didn’t see so good.

Did I mention the STITCHES in your eyeball?

Think about that a little. Go ahead. Savor the image.

*

It didn’t help matters that when I was very, very young, I actually saw a couple of people who’d had this kind of surgery. I remember one of them, a little man who worked at a newsstand downtown, whose lenses where so thick and so powerful that his eyes seemed vast, as though they occupied half his face.

I’m sure he was a really nice guy. But, to me in all my vast experience as a four-year-old . . . he looked like something out of a Japanese Monster Movie.

*

Now, as I understand it, modern cataract surgery only began in 1949—just sixty years ago, as of this writing. I’m 51, remember, so that’s not too long before I was born. Or, anyway, way too close for comfort.

But, taking up the story again, ‘round abouts ‘49, a British doctor noticed the interesting fact that when some British pilots had gotten bits of their Plexiglas cockpit domes into their eyes during crashes and dust-ups with the Beastly Hun (that was back before Germans were cool again), the material was “inert.” That means the eyes didn’t seem to mind the stuff being in there.

Well, if that was so—thought the good doctor—then you could build a new lens out of transparent plastic and put it into the eye itself. Good-by coke bottle bottom glasses. And good riddance.

But, you still had to get the eye open first. With a knife. And then close it up afterwards.

Did I mention STITCHES in the eyeball?

Good. Just checking.

*

So, all through my childhood, the standard operating procedure for cataract surgery was that they performed the operation with a (gulp) scalpel, then they sewed up your eye (double gulp), and then they put you in a bed with sandbags on either side of your head. So you couldn’t roll over. And disturb the stitches.

As in STITCHES.

As in little bits of string. Sewn into and through your eyes.

As in . . . ARGH.


*

But, all through the 1960s and 1970s, doctors figured out new and better ways of opening up the eye, removing the cataract, and installing a new lens. By the 1980s and 1990s, it was painless. And they’d figured out how to do microsurgery so they didn’t have to open up your eye with razor blade any more. And they’d come up with soft lenses that can slip into the eye with a minimum of fuss.

Actually, the lenses are pretty terrific all by themselves. They fold in half, you see, so they can enter the eye through an incision no bigger than a ladybug’s left nostril.

Very cool, really.

*

So, today, except in extreme cases, cataract surgery is quick, painless, easy, and completely safe.

And my rational, logical, coherent, and well-informed brain knew all that.

Except…except …

My irrational brain was going…

THEY ARE GOING TO PUT STITCHES IN MY EYE!!!!

*

While driving, and well before I got home, I had also invented this fascinating image . . .

Basically Freddy Kruger in a white coat. With a dental drill. Talking about corneas.

Ah, the gift of a vivid imagination. Wonderful, really.

*

Anyway, that’s where I was, psychic-spacewise. Not a great place, but, what the heck (I figured), at least I’ve made the appointment. Might as well get it over with. And, besides . . . besides . . . after that shock, the day just couldn’t get worse. I mean, it just couldn’t.

Could it?

Naw. Not possible.

So thinking, I pulled into my driveway and looked up the walk to the door. And, there, in the box, was . . .

The Mail.

But that’s for next time.

*

Onward and upward.
























Copyright © 2009 Michael Jay Tucker

Friday, January 30, 2009

Martha

She loves birds.

We have feeders in the back, on the porch, and in winter we fill them with seed. Sometimes, then, at breakfast, she watches them out the glass door that opens off the dining room. She watches them move, flitter, dash from one side to the other.

Sometimes she will call me out from my office. “There’s a cardinal!” Whispered urgently. Commandingly. Or “A blue jay!” Sotto voce. I’ll come. I’ll look. I’ll see a flash of color. A streak of red or blue. Nothing more.

They reveal themselves to her. Their friend and protector. Not to me.


*

Conversely.

She hates the squirrel that lives out back in the neighbor’s tree, and who comes and gorges himself at the feeders. She wouldn’t mind, I think, if he were not so clearly making a pig of himself. If he only ate what he needed and then left the rest.

But that is not the way of squirrels, and he gobbles up the seed until his cheeks bulge and his stomach sways.

Thus, there is a war between them, my wife and the neighbor’s squirrel. When she sees him she yells or bangs on the window. He rears up and regards her for a moment. Then, face down and tail up, he goes back to the trough.

She opens the door and the squirrel finally dashes away (but not too fast). Sometimes she throws something after him. A stale piece of bread or something that she was going to put out for him later. It falls into the snow in the yard.

In about an hour, he’ll be back. And the whole thing—the feeding, the yelling, the tail in the air, the tossed crust—will repeat itself.

Sometimes, I think they enjoy it.


*

For many years, she was a teacher. Now she is teacher of teachers. Do not make the joke about those who can’t, teach, and those who can’t teach, teach teachers. I’ve seen people make it in her presence. They have not done it twice.

More importantly, do not say such things to those who were her students.

They might well slaughter you.

*

They adore her. I mean her students.

For twenty years now she’s been in the Department of Education at Tufts. She takes young people who are often little more than children themselves and, somehow, makes them into teachers. She equips them, I don’t know how, to deal with adolescents and parents, school boards and politicians, lesson plans and No Child Left Behind.

It has been hard on her, these last few years. The Bush administration confused excellence with obedience. Men and women who could not tolerate their teenager at home, never-the-less were certain they knew best how to manage classrooms of a hundred of them.


*

Then there is the academy itself. Martha is not, technically, a professor. She is, technically, a Lecturer. This means she cannot obtain tenure. She cannot vote in certain important assemblies. She is regarded, in ever so polite a way, as Not Quite Top Drawer. Or Dwawer, as they like to say, in the counterfeit trans-Atlantic accents of a certain class of academic.

This is because Martha is, well, a mere technician. She has actually taught in schools. She works with real students. She goes out into public schools and finds placements for student teachers.

These are lesser things.

The REAL educational academic works in theory. And abstraction. And grand insights. And, if possible, never sees a human being. Or, at least, not a student.

So . . .

So she is not tenured. Will never be tenured. And, sometimes those of her colleagues who are say things, “I think we’re seriously under-theorized here.” Meaning that her wisdom, derived from actual evidence, must not be as good as their dogma, derived from wishful thinking.

But, here’s the rub. In times of trouble, when this student is in crisis, or that funding has vanished . . . it is to Martha that they turn.


*

As I say, her students adore her. For years after they’ve left her classes, they send Christmas cards and email.

For some reason she is a particular favorite of those of her students who are minorities—the young men and women who are, as they say now “people of color.”

I’m not sure why. Maybe it is because she never manifests that evangelical and self-congratulatory tolerance of diversity, so common among Right Thinking People, so obviously synthetic, so loudly proclaimed. She is not, in other words, like one of her colleagues, a white middle-class woman with a Ph.D. and a six-figure income, who once slipped and began to lecture a black woman on what it was “really like” to be “Coloured In America”.

*

Some of my wife’s students have announced that they are adopting her. She is to be, they say, their mother.

One of these is Faith.

Faith is a tall, thin, energetic “woman of color.” She is bright and intelligent, very Southern, and her eyes glow with barely suppressed mischief. She has taken to calling Martha “Mom.” My son, David, is “Little Bro.” Recently, I’ve been promoted to “Dad.”

This leads to some interesting situations, many of them engineered by Faith herself. Recently, we took her for her birthday to a little tourist town up the coast. It’s a place with ocean views and small shops. I quite like it, but it tends to attract a—shall we say?— unadventurous crowd. Don’t get me wrong. The tourists are not evil. They are not bigoted. But they are very, very suburban.

We went into one of the shops. It had tall shelves reaching almost to the ceiling. That meant that you could hear the other customers in the place, but you might not be able to see them.

I was coming around a corner when I heard Faith yell cheerily, “Oh, Mom! Did you see this?” She was holding some piece of Mexican tinwear. “Isn’t it terrific? I’m going to have to get that.” Then, “Dad! I left my purse in the car. Would you tell me where you parked so I can get it?”

Around me I heard the amused murmurs of my fellow customers.

I told Faith I would get the purse and she could stay there, with “mom.” Next to me, a woman of my age said, smiling, “Or Dad will just end up paying for it.” I nodded. She turned the corner with me. She saw Faith.

Her smile froze like water on a windshield in February.

*

As I say, it has been hard for her, these past few years.

A bunch of reasons for that. David has gone to school and is no longer in the house, which is good and inevitable, but still …hard. And then there was the fact that I went back to school, and it proved such a disaster, and she had to watch.

Then, finally, there have been the Times. Our age. The last eight years . . . 9-11, the War in Iraq, so much more.

On some level, I don’t think she really minded the fact that Washington went Conservative during those years. She’s a liberal, but she can reach out to the other side . . . so long as it is real. So long as it, too, is idealistic. So long as it strives for some sort of good, though she may not agree on the definition of good.

But, Washington for the last eight years has been so very much not idealistic, not concerned with good … its ideology not conservative but merely hateful, a faux-conservatism that disguised blatant greed and power-lust as Family Values and Morality.

So, she has suffered.

There is still a part of her, you see, that genuinely believes in the virtue of men and women . . . despite all the evidence to the contrary.


*

I think, on some level, she remains the girl she was in the sixties. I’ve seen pictures of her then. She was oh-so-achingly young. Her hair was long and straight. She wore bright colors and jeans. She drove a VW beetle. She had the albums of Peter, Paul, and Mary. She believed . . . as God was her witness . . . that things might be made better.

I wish I had known her then. I wish I had been at the same place, been the same age . . . but, such are the cruelties of circumstance. At least I did meet her, finally, in 1979, when we were both at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. I believe she was in the very first class I ever took there.

I tried to speak to her after that first class . . . and she was off like a shot. Out the door. Across the campus. And away. I’m not sure she slowed down until she was in her apartment with the door bolted.

It took me two years to land a date.

But that’s a story for another day. When I have a lot more time.


*

We married in 1982.

For some reason, she’s stayed with me ever since. Again, I’m a little mystified as to why. Her friends are confused as well. Sometimes they ask, meaning it as a joke, “Did you have to marry him?”

We’ve also heard the same thing from some of my co-workers, but not as a joke. “How do you stand it?” asked the woman who did package ads sales at one magazine, during the Christmas party.

Then, the woman realized what she had said, and quickly tried to make it funny. “I mean, you know, not that it would be bad or anything . . .”

Except, of course, sometimes it really IS bad. I have not, as they say, been able to give her the moon and the stars. I have not always been as kind, as strong, as gentle, as …well, anything…as I should have been for her.

Yet she has remained.


*

I do not deserve her.

But that, of course, does not mean I will let her get away.

*

One last story. This one about me rather than her.

Several years ago, I was at one of the magazines for which I worked. I found myself in a conversation with a number of other editors. These included a woman of about my own age, also married, and with a bawdy sense of humor.

Listening to us, from across the room, was another woman. She was quite young, though older than her years. She had been the daughter of a Yugoslavian diplomat. She had traveled the world as a child, and worked now in the U.S., while her country split into warring parts.

Anyway, the older woman asked me about my future plans. If I intended to retire and so on. It wasn’t a serious conversation, so I made a joke of it. I said I hoped to be a decadent old bastard.

She laughed and said, “With the young mistress?”

No, I replied, if Martha found out, she’d kill me. The older woman laughed.

But, then, from the other corner of the room, came the low, musical, slightly accented voice of the Yugoslav.

“Men,” she said, “always say that when they don’t want to admit they love their wives.”

Ah…


*

She was right.

Very well.

I shall admit it here.

I do. Enormously.

More than words, here or anywhere, can even begin to say.


*

Onward and upward.









Copyright © 2009 Michael Jay Tucker

Friday, January 23, 2009

Intermezzo And Inauguration

I write this (in my head) while seated in a dentist’s chair.

The dentist in question, plus an assistant, a hygienist, and the Lady Out Front Who Does The Billing are all . . . ALL … trying to insert various instruments of mass destruction into my mouth. I think that was an oil derrick that just went in a moment ago. Hard to tell, though. Could have been an aircraft carrier.

Oh, and there’s a nasty grinding sound as the dentist does something singularly horrible to me involving two fillings and a crown.

Great stuff.

Particularly since I hadn’t meant to write it at all.


*

It’s like this: you’ll recall that I’m re-starting explosive-cargo. You’ll recall as well that I was doing a quick recap on my life and the lives of my family so everybody could catch up with events. Last week, I did my son, David. And he’s almost forgiven me for it. Not quite. But almost. And I suspect after a couple of decades in therapy, he’ll look back and laugh. It’ll be a pained, hysterical laugh, but a laugh just the same.

This week I’d originally planned to move to Martha, my beloved wife … “the idol of me life” . . . who has (for reasons beyond the comprehension of mere mortals) actually stayed married to me for … uh, er . . . 25 years now. (YIKES.)

But, then, I remembered that this is Inauguration week. And, as everybody knows, it’s a ye ole historic occasion. As I write this, Barack Obama is becoming the 44th President of the United States of America.

They say upwards to two million people are watching him take the oath. Millions of Americans more sit fascinated in front of their TV screens. Billions of others, in the every nation on the globe, follow the proceedings with breathless anticipation.

And me . . . ?

I’ve got an oil derrick in my face.

*

In some ways I don’t really mind. This was the only time I could get the appointment. And, besides, when I did make it, some months ago, I didn’t connect “January 20 the Dentist Date” with “January 20 the Most Important Historical Event In Recent American History.”

Besides, you can always catch it all on the news tonight and . . .

And . . .

And who the Halibut do I think I’m fooling?

I HATE IT.

*

The dentist has this little wheel thing on what looks like a scaled down rotary saw. He’s busy whacking away at this molar in the back that needs to be filed down to a nubbin.

And there’s this lovely smell. Sort of like … well, when you were a kid, did you ever roast a grasshopper with a magnifying glass? Sort of like that. But with the faint and delicate tang of raw rubber in a hot box.

This is the way that human teeth . . . and other things . . . smell when they burn.

If, per chance, I should kick the big one, and the gleeful heirs decide on cremation, would you remind me to hold my nose? Thanx loads.


*

I’m missing the Inauguration . . . well, at least on TV. I wouldn’t actually have gone to Washington, of course. But I am missing the live broadcast. Which saddens me.

Actually, it’s been interesting to watch the coverage of the new Presidency for the last few weeks. I’ve tuned in now and then, on those rare occasions when it hasn’t made more sense to get your news from the ‘net.

Mostly it’s been pundits telling us what to expect from the incoming Administration and/or the Inauguration. CNNers gaze at us mournfully and repeat the endless series of trials that await the new President (the economy, the war, global warming…ad infinitum), usually with the distinct overtone that Nothing Can Be Done. Fox bombastoids sneeringly pronounce Obama a new Clinton…or, at the very least, Out Of Touch With American Values. Whatever the h*ll that means.

Yet, if you looked at them closely, you detected hints of nervousness, a fearful glancing to the right and the left, an uncertainty…

Perhaps they realize, however dimly, that the upcoming Inauguration will be a Real Event, which will genuinely fascinate the American People, and which will genuinely effect us for generations to come.

It is not, in other words, one of their Manufactured Incidents, one of their little circuses designed not to reveal the news but to conceal it.

Instead, it is authentic. It is beyond their control.

And they hate it.


*

A tooth explodes. Bits and pieces of enameled shrapnel bound about my tongue. “Excellent,” says the dentist.

For this . . . for this . . . I am missing the Inauguration.

Later, I will see parts of the Inauguration on the replays. I will watch while the President Elect becomes the President in Fact. I will watch while he puts his hand on a Bible and swears to defend the Constitution. Every president does, of course, but some mean it more than others.

The thing that strikes me most is actually not the President himself but his wife, who stands next to him while the oath is administered. Her face is animated, she smiles or looks out at the crowd, holds her husband.

And this is different. How often we have seen Presidential spouses wearing what I’ve come to call “The Nancy Reagan Stare,” that look of manufactured adoration, unblinking and unreal, while the icy politician within pretends to be the dutiful helpmate.

This woman, as she stands in the cold beside the 44th president, is alive.

That intrigues me.

*

After that, I will watch the live broadcast of limos and buses making their way through the streets. I will watch them arrive at a massive reviewing stand. Dignitaries of various sorts make their way into its copious interior. In a moment, parades will begin.

The broadcaster narrating the affair will refer to these men and women as VIPs—“Vee Eye Pees”—Very Important Persons. Dems and Reps and everything in between. I have hated the term since I heard it as a child. You see, if someone is a VIP, surely that implies that someone else is not important at all.

The camera will come in for a close up on the VIPs emerging from the limos. They are little different from what you’d expect. Chiefly, there are of two sorts. First, are the Men, white haired and white skinned, the sort you find on stamps and boards of directors. They emerge blinking into the light. They wave to the crowd, not seeing the people within it.

Second, are the Women, striding purposely forward. They wear their business suits and stern expressions. They make a cult of their own toughness and their own success. More than anyone, they worship at the shrine of Our Lady of the Perpetual Career.

I wonder, do either of them glance out at the men and women who line the streets? The two million strong who watch them? Do they ever suspect . . . even dream! . . . that those uncounted multitudes might even now be judging them?

And that they might be found wanting?

*

I will watch as well while the Bushes leave the White House and board the helicopter that will take them away. There is an uncomfortable similarity to the Fall of Saigon, the Huey helicopters whisking ministers and orphans to overburdened aircraft carriers and exile.

*

Similarly, I will watch former Vice President Dick Cheney as he is wheeled into the reviewing stand. He threw his back out “moving boxes,” and so attends the event in a wheel chair.

He will sit and scowl, looking rather like Davros, creator of the Daleks in Doctor Who.

I think, on some level, he is the most interesting vice president the country has ever possessed. If I were still a historian (had not, that is, been cast from academic heaven by the holy angels of my dissertation committee), I would want to study him.

Alone among vice presidents, he was not really a politician. There was no kissing babies for him. He wouldn’t have glorified Joe The Plumber. He was a pure technocrat, interested solely in the exercise of power, and very much his President’s unelected prime minister.

At one time I thought he might be the future of the American executive—the gray man behind the scenes, the appointed and non-democratic Head Of Government—as opposed to the President, selected by ballot and hanging chads to be the (irrelevant) Head of State, allowed out now and then to proclaim that this Mission is Accomplished, that Course To Be Stayed.

That could still be the future. It will depend greatly on this new President, on the power of the Bush-era elites to smear him, and on the willingness of Americans in general to let it happen.


*


And the smearing has begun already, hasn’t it? From the Right … and the Left.

On some level, the Right is the better. It, at least, is more honest about what it’s doing. The more or less open appeals to racism (“Obama the Magic Negro”), the ubiquitous references to his middle name (“Hussein”), the whisper campaign begun during the election and continued to this day that he is a crypto-Moslem (or at least un-America) . . . all these are happening as the Tom Delay branch of the GOP seeks its return to absolute power.

(One wonders, in the end, will that form of the GOP, perhaps under a new name and as a new party, find itself meeting in sheets under a flaming cross?)

But, the Left is not to be forgiven. Already . . . already . . . one hears the fashionable disillusionment in their voices, sees the weary (and oh so trendy) cynicism in their eyes. Obama will be not liberal enough . . . not radical enough . . . not Green enough . . . not, well, fill in the blank.

This is not to say that he will actually be illiberal, or non-Green, or fill-in-the-blank. But complaint is their forte, and all that remains to them now that they have so thoroughly abandoned any attempt at actually impacting the world for the better.

*

But isn’t just politics. It is the American system.

As I sit watching the crowds and the VIPs in their glass booth, I will recall the teachers in local schools who refused to let their students view the Inauguration during class time because “education doesn’t pause for history.” As though history were not education. As though their endless and repetitive worksheets were.

But, the teachers are not alone. As I watch the Vips behind their glass staring down at the parade below them . . . and as I consider the men and women (oh so sophisticated) that I met in the academy and the world . . . I can almost hear their thoughts. How, they think, banal.

The parade begins and soon winds by them. It is an endless succession of high school marching bands, police on horses, police and firemen with bagpipes, Masons and Shriners, church groups and youth clubs . . .

How banal. How bourgeois—you can hear them thinking. What, after all, is more pathetic than a high school marching band? An assembly of asthmatic nerds tinkling on triangles? What is more prole than a policeman or a fireman with a bagpipe? The man who maintains antique conceptions of honor, and plays Amazing Grace at the funerals of friends? What is more absurd than a Shriner? A little man in a fake fez and a miniature car?

Except . . .

Except . . .

The high school band did not lead us into Iraq. The firemen and policeman clawed survivors out of the rubble after 9-11. The Shriners founded and funded the hospitals that provide free care to children when our noble elite graciously declined to give a damn.

*

The exploding tooth is finished now. The assistant is now occupied sweeping up the remains. She sticks a suction tube in my mouth and I hear the little clattering of tooth bits going down the pipe.

“There, looks great,” says the dentist.

Really?

“You see,” he continues, “sometimes you have to take everything down to the beginnings to build back up again.”

Well…

Couldn’t ask for a better metaphor, could we?

*

A few minutes later they have me bite down on some ghastly substance that falls somewhere between silly putty and fresh mud. The remains of my tooth will leave an impression and they’ll make the crown from it later.

The dentist goes off to commit some other act of toothy carnage. The hygienist gives me a moist towelette so that I can clean up later. She warns me that my lips may be dry for the rest of the day.

I rise unsteadily from the chair and wobble into the lobby. My coat waits for me on a peg in the wall. Shortly, I exit into the bitter Boston winter, crunch my way over the ice in the parking lot, and go home to watch what remains of the Inauguration.

And, as I go, I think . . . if I were the historian my dissertation committee emphatically assured me I was not, I would compare the day to another Inauguration, this one 180 years ago. I mean, of course, that of Jackson in 1829.

It may have been the most famous Inauguration in American history. Jackson, you see, was many things . . . including a racist and something of a bastard . . . but he was also a genuine populist. He invited his homespun followers into the White House. To the horror of All Right Thinking People, they came.

And, at that moment, the American landed elites who had ruled for so terribly long, began to suspect that just maybe their day was past.

*

Oh, yes, I can hear Those Who Know Best already. The academics, the pundits, the intellectuals…They are saying, no, Your Analogy Is Flawed. It Lacks Proper Grounding In Historical Methodology. You Are Under-theorized. Your interpretation is clichéd, and you, yourself, are Inane.

Probably true.

Yet . . .

And yet . .

*

Later, I will sit at home, nursing my face and watching television.

Watching the endless faces, of all colors and shapes, lining the streets.

And I will wonder.

Our elite? Does it have the wisdom, the insight, and the understanding to look at those millions in DC and be, in however small a way …

Afraid.

*


Until next time,

Onward and upward.












Copyright © 2009 Michael Jay Tucker

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Dramatis Personae (#1): David

Hey, Gang,

So, it’s been a while since we last committed communicatin’, so I thought I’d bring everybody up to speed on who’s doing what where and why.

First of all, you’ll recall that I have a son by the name of David Tillman Tucker. The “Tillman” part comes from his Granddad, who is Tillman Jessie Tucker Jr. No. Really. Could I make up a thing like that?

Actually, I came within a inch being named “Tillman Jessie Tucker III,” but at the last minute my parents decided that naming me TJT III would qualify as either an advanced form of child abuse or being an Episcopalian. Which is a joke you can only understand if you also know that being Episcopalian was once a Big Thing for rich white people from Eastern States … i.e., the sort of folk who have well-muscled sphincters, trust funds, and the sort of names that are just cracker-jack full of hyphens (“Frederick Tott-Waller,” “Paul Flemhocker-Moningglory”). Names which, further more, show up a lot on war memorials to men (“the glorious fallen”) who got shot, gassed, and bombed defending democracy in the holy crusade World War I (“the war to end all wars”). Which, you’ll recall, led directly Stalin, Hitler, and World War II.

So, let that be a lesson. Never be an Episcopalian. Bad for your health.

Where was I? Oh, yes, David.

Anyway, last we met, he was in high school. He’s not any more. Which is a Very Good Thing. You see, he’s very, very bright . . . and well read . . . and a natural scholar. So, of course, most of his teachers hated his guts. Par for the course.

The best story I have about his high school years is the time he told his history teacher, “Sir, you are the only man in America who could make the Renaissance boring.” He was right. Not particularly diplomatic, but right.

Anyway, after several painful years for him, and many charming little tête-à-têtes qua knife fights between me and the Vice Principal in Charge of Discipline, he got his diploma and was off like a shot. His mother and I breathed a sigh of relief and the Vice Principal (in Charge of Discipline) retired to a small town in eastern Mass where he could try to re-grow all the hair he’d pulled out during parent conferences.


*

So, then, David had a severe attack of being a Barista. If you’re unfamiliar with the term (which means you’ve never been to Starbucks or otherwise have spent the last thirty years in a cave on Mars), a “Barista” is a person who makes coffee in cafes and coffee bars.

But there are Baristas and then there are Baristas. There are, you see, Baristas who just push the button on the automatic espresso maker and watch while the freeze-dried crystals congeal in a gelatinous mass on the bottom of the cup. I particularly like the congealing part. You can use it to fix leaks in swimming pools and radiators.

But, there’s another kind of Barista. That’s the sort who plays the ‘spresso-maker the way Yo Yo Ma gets chummy with his cello. That’s the kind that David was. He worked in high class restaurants where I can’t pronounce, much less afford half the things on the menu. He also got his Barista training from an international consultant from Denmark and when it was all over he could do things that super-Baristas do. Like, for instance, they trace intricate designs in cappuccino foam. David’s signature design was a little tree. Looked sort of deciduous but one can never tell about the odd pine slipping in when you’re not looking.

In fact, David came in fourth in a National Barista Competition. You didn’t know there was such a thing, did you? But, yes, they exist (again, could I make that up?) and scores of Baristas converge upon convention centers and produce rival coffee drinks for hard-eyed judges. Think “Best In Show” but with caffeine.

And, yes, it’s as scary as it sounds.

*

But, then, after a couple of years, David decided that there was only so much you could do with cappuccino foam. So, he went off to Art School and is now doing things with painting, wood-work, metal, videos, carpentry, “conceptional art,” and lots of other stuff that probably violate at least three laws of physics. Not to mention zoning ordinances about excessive intelligence in confined spaces. He also does things like write about aesthetics, art and social theory, obscure Middle European philosophers, important movie directors, modern vs. contemporary art, etc., etc., and (of course) etc.

Sometimes I think about sending a few snaps of his works to his old Vice Principal (in Charge of Discipline). The man who was so sure that David Would Fail. But, then, I think, No, I don’t want to make his head explode. Attractive as that concept is.

*

Okay, but you may be asking yourself, “Self, how is an art students supposed to make money in this life? I mean, really, Self, aren’t you being pretty d*man impractical about this?”

The answer, strangely enough, is not necessarily. Some art students actually do go on to become artists and (surprise surprise) even make money at it. Why not? It’s a business (forgive me) like any other, and a smart operator can do okay.

Besides which, even the art students who don’t become artists tend to go on to other things. They funnel up into graduate schools and professions that require a combination of technical and aesthetic skills—quite literally everything from computer graphics to chemistry. In David’s case, that’s probably going to be architecture . . . but, then again, maybe not. It all depends on the time and tides in his affairs.

Besides, he’s got a backup plan.. Over the past few years he’s developed a taste for bicycling. Moreover, he’s become a certified bike mechanic. In fact, he’s managing a co-op bike shop at Harvard University—specifically, Quad Bikes. He and the others there do bike repairs, and rebuild and sell used bikes.

It’s kind of scary, really. I go and visit the shop and watch him upend bikes, pull this and fasten that, straighten something else, and, voila, what had before been a tangle of pipes and wires is actually usable.

As I say, scary. You see, the mechanical gene bounced right over the top of me. I can barely tie my shoes, much less fix something. Yet, he makes it look easy.

Also intimidating is that he has a bit of business sense. I meet him for dinner or lunch and he tells me cheerfully about how he’s doing the profit and loss statements, and how Quick Books behaves in this or that circumstances, and how he’s meeting with the co-op board of directors to talk about next year’s income.

Again, it bounced over me. My family—my mother, my father—they have those kind of skills. But me? No. Not in the least. I mean, I can’t get my check book to balance . . . or find it, for that matter. I think it’s on the kitchen table, somewhere. Probably under that stack of bills and the fruit basket. Hard to tell.

Ah well . . .

*

So, anyway, he’s a bike maven and a bike mechanic. He’s even got followers—that is, people who will want him, and him alone, to do the repairs on their ten speeds and mountain bikes. I suppose every good mechanic does, but, still, it intrigues me. Harvard students and staff members, tenured faculty and deans, appear at his door and politely request his attentions.

I suspect that, if he wished, he could even make biking and the business of biking his career. He could work in shops, or own one, pretty much anywhere in the country, and do rather well at it. He could make an excellent income—something to be valued in this curious day, when we have been so lovingly bequeathed a devastated economy by the Bush administration, and when oil prices flutter up and down (but usually up) like a hummingbird in a hurricane at the least rumor of international strife.

*

Though, even if he doesn’t go into the bike trade in the long run, there’s still a short-run advantage in it . . . for me.

You see, he brings us great stories from the shop.

My favorite of his most recent reports goes as follows: It seems that one day a customer came into the shop. I like to envision the man as a self-important faculty member, or an obnoxious administrator. He wanted his bike tuned and prepared for the summer months. He left it and departed.

David then began to look at it. He put it up on a rack and discovered . . . hello! . . . that someone had taken a bolt cutter and carefully, expertly nicked one of the supports of the front wheel. It had been done in such a way as to make it almost undetectable. Yet, if the rider had gone over a curb or hit a pothole, the wheel would have bent double . . .”tacoed,” was the expression my son used. That would have doubtlessly thrown the rider over the handlebars, which would have almost certainly injured him quite seriously, and might even have killed him.

My son called the owner and explained the situation. The man came to the shop and examined the bike. “Probably just some kids fooling around,” he said, and left.

But, of course, it was no such thing. Whoever had sabotaged the bike had known precisely where to make the cut. And they had had access to the bike itself, which would have been difficult given that the man kept it off the street.

So, David was left to wonder . . . who hated that man so much? Who hated the man, AND was close enough to him to have access to the bike?

A co-worker? A student? A member of his own family? His wife or his child?

The man, I gather, has not been in David’s shop again since.

And . . .

You gotta admit. It’s a great opening for a mystery novel.

*

Maybe that’s my next career, now that the academic thing didn’t work out. Maybe I’ll write whodunits. I’ll write mystery novels with a bike theme. I’ll make David the (thinly) disguised protagonist. The stories will all involve the Butler doing nefarious things to Lord Smythblater’s ten speed behind the carriage house. Or, gangs of international bike perverts stealing antique three wheelers for use in Schwinn porn. (Horrors.)

I’ve even got a title for the series.

David Tucker: Bike Detective.

*

Okay, it’s a dumb idea. For one thing, David would kill me. For another, well, wouldn’t want to offend all those bike perverts out there. You never can tell when one of them is going to audit your taxes or something. (“About this deduction for axle grease . . .”)

Still . . .

Do you suppose … just by chance… perhaps…

I could get my former dissertation members interested in biking?

*

Just kidding.


*

Anyway, so that’s David. Next week, we do … the Spouse!

Stay tuned and …

Onward and upward.

Thursday, January 08, 2009

My (not so) Brilliant Career

Well, I’m back.

I’m almost embarrassed to resume this blog/ezine. I’ve been away so long. I don’t know how many of you are still out there. Or, for that matter, among those who remain, how many of you care to continue reading my turgid little missives.

Like I say, I’m embarrassed. More, I’m ashamed. At one time, I had over 2000 subscribers, and God only knows what the pass-along readership was. I even did a couple of self-published books (Xlibris) that were collections of the columns. But I let it all go away.

Why?

A bunch of reasons. I got busy. I lost my job. I had a little bout of Depression—not deep, fortunately, but enough to make things difficult. Then, too, when I tried to switch the ezine version of Xcargo to a blog, it just wasn’t the same. In a ‘zine, you have a certain intimacy with your readers. Those of you out there would write me back. I knew your names and your email addresses. It’s not quite like that with a blog.

But, also . . . a bigger reason.

I went back to school.

It was the biggest mistake of my life.


*

I’ll tell you my story in bits and pieces. Maybe, as time goes on, I’ll give you a complete accounting of my adventures in the academy. I’ll call it “My (not so) Brilliant Career.”

But, today, let me just give you the quickest overview.

It began just about eight years ago. I had lost my job as a trade press editor. I was at, in some ways, the peak of my career. I was an editor-in-chief of an online publication dealing with e-business and middleware (a kind of software that resides between applications and things like databases. It was the buzz word of the day, and a Very Big Thing).

But, I found myself utterly unable to connect with my work. That was partly because of the little bout of Depression. But mostly it was because I just didn’t believe in what I was writing and editing. I remember, once, having to quote an esteemed expert who announced that business was really all about bookkeeping, and that mere sales only got in the way.

And, then, finally, there was a bit of a power struggle going on in the company. The publisher brought in a new vice president of content. I think she may not have cared for underlings who were not of her own selection. And, so, I was gone.


*

So, there I was . . . jobless . . . and strangely unmoved by the fact. I did some freelance. I sent our resumes. But nothing came of it.

Then, my parents (bless them!) suggested Why Don’t You Go Back To School and Become A Professor? My wife agreed. Everyone knew that my real skill was in writing, not editing computer texts. And, besides, I’m fascinated by history, and I’m a good teacher, strangely enough.

So, I did. I got admitted to the Master’s Program in History at Northeastern University.

And, you know, it was wonderful. For two years, I had the time of my life. My professors were encouraging. Some of them have become my friends.

I wrote a Master’s thesis—which I then turned into a book and got published. It was called “ ‘And then they loved him,’ Seward Collins and the Chimera of an American Fascism.” I’ll tell you all about it some other time.

So, there I was, with a new-minted Masters, a scholarly book, and a passion for the subject matter.

Therefore, with a bit of effort, I got myself admitted to the Ph.D. program in history at . . . a school I won’t name. Suffice to say that it was at a University located roughly between Boston and Western Massachusetts.

And then . . .

I found myself in hell.

*

What follows is my perception of my time at the University I shall not name. The people there doubtless have quite another version of events.

But, here is mine.

*

I once wrote a (very bad) horror novel in which the main character is murdered and then awakens in something like Hades. He is buried under dead and rotting bodies. He cannot move, he cannot see, he cannot breathe . . . though his lungs scream for air. He lies there for what seems like centuries until an earthquake—actually, a “corpse-quake”—frees him.

It was sort of like that.

I’m not quite sure what I did to offend the faculty, but offend them I certainly did. After the first year, in which I got As in every class and no one objected to my dissertation proposal, I was suddenly anathema in the second year. The same material, which, before, had been acceptable and even praised, was now “trivial” and “meaningless.”

When I actually started writing the dissertation, things got—if possible—worse. I would send my committee a chapter, and they would not respond for weeks . . . or months. Once they did not even acknowledge that I’d sent them material for two months.

And when they did respond, it was with a thousand, thousand objections. Every line of text was insufficient. Every word wasn’t right.

And the objections? They did not seem to me to be constructive. They seemed to me to be insulting. “So WHAT?” “Stop IT!” “FOCUS!”

*

Finally, after two years…and after six or seven rewrites (I’ve lost count) . . . my committee members sent me a note saying simply that they would no longer work with me.

I was not, they said, a scholar.

*

Should I defend myself? Should I say that if I’m not a scholar then why was it that my book on Seward Collins was well reviewed? And that I have published articles in scholarly journals? And that my own committee members had no objections to my work until the second year of my time at their University?

Or, better still, should I ask . . . if I’m not a scholar and my work demonstrates “no scholarship” . . . then why was it that when I posted the first chapter of my dissertation to an academic news-group and asked for comments, no one said that it was “unscholarly”? They had concerns, yes, but no one said it was not a work of scholarship.

Perhaps I should do all these things. And, indeed, I will write a complaint to the University. I’ll ask these questions and point out these facts. But, come, let us confess, nothing will come of it. The administration will make a few noises, but it must support its professors if it is to function. That is the reality of college life.

I could sue them. I have explored that possibility. But, that, too, is problematic. I have discovered that historically the courts rule in the favor of schools at the expense of graduate students.

Besides . . .


*

Maybe they’re right. Maybe I’m not a “scholar.” At least, not as they define the word.

On some level, I admit that I’m not cut out to be an academic. I love history, yes, and I am a good teacher . . . but these characteristics do not make me a “scholar.” Not their sort, I mean.

You see, there are scholars and then there are scholars. And, the art of being their sort of scholar is very much like that of being a fashionista. It is the business of knowing who’s in and who’s out.

Their sort of scholar is an expert at knowing which professors are trendy to footnote, knowing which theories are fashionable and even know which WORDs are considered outré.

(Once I used the term “elite,” and was taken quite over the coals for it. Genuine scholars do not, I was told, use that expression. Yet, the reality is that we are divided between the rulers and the ruled . . . and only the most willfully blind would ignore that. The most willfully blind, or those who are in fact among the elite and therefore defend their position by pretending it does not exist.)

But, the point is that I’m not built for their world. Oh, I can study, research, know the secondary literature, give papers and defend them. But, I have never been and never will be fashionable. I do not revel in the conflict of theory vs. theory, the combat of dueling departments, the furies and personal animosities of the academic life.

I love only the romance of history . . . the simple narratives of men and women who lived it . . . their experiences and lives, their pains and pleasures, their joy and grief, and, in short, their stories.

*

So what shall I do?

Well, I will not abandon the academy just because it has chosen to abandon me. I will continue to study and publish and print. I have, after all, three Master’s degrees now, two in history and an MFA in writing. My committee may deprive me of my Ph.D., but not of my learning.

And, I will teach. I am already employed as a member of adjunct faculty at Northeastern University and Cambridge College. I like to teach. I like my students.

Strangely, this too makes me unfit to be my committee’s kind of scholar. You see, scholars of their sort are not much interested in teaching. They regard their classes as an unfortunate distraction and their students as intruders. They would much rather conduct their research. Or, rather, have their graduate students do the research, and then they write their monographs in the cork-walled privacy of their offices.

And that is not a bad thing. Society needs such people . . . even if there is something odd about the fact that they are employed as educators, yet have little interest in education.

But, this gives me an advantage. I will seek out teaching positions. They will not. They will not compete with me.


*

And I will write. I will write not only academic papers, but also popular material. I will take history, when I can, to people who are not academics . . . who, like me, love the stories of history. Perhaps, people like you.

This, by the way, most of all makes me unfit to be my committee’s sort of scholar. Simply put, that sort of scholar would never deign to write for someone like you . . . a mere layman, whose opinions are not learned, and whose intelligence is doubtful. You have no critical intelligence, no solid background, no acceptable interpretative apparatus. You are (poor soul) Undertheorized and do not maintain the Standards We Hold Dear.

You are, therefore, not worth talking to. Not like themselves. Who are so wise and informed.

That is, of course, in their own humble opinion.

*

So, I will write. I will teach

And I will return to you . . . if you’ll have me . . . you who were the readers of the old explosive-cargo, and who I hope will be the readers of the new.

Forgive me for being away so long.

*

Next week, I’ll start again. Next week, I promise, I’ll try to be funny. I’ve much to tell you about my life over the last few years, and much of it is pleasant and laughable. Much of it I enjoyed enormously. My son graduated from high school and went to college. We have a new puppy. We have had adventures.

Next week I will be cheery.

But, right now, I must take a moment to be grim.

For, you see, I was half in love with the academy. But, my love was unrequited. Indeed, it was rejected. And, like all those who are cast out, I must, for a time, wrestle with the passions . . .

Of the lover scorned.

*

Until next time . . .

Onward and upward.














Copyright © 2009 Michael Jay Tucker

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Friday, April 13, 2007

The Grandfather

You know, it was Easter the other day, and as I reflected over eggs, something dawned on me.

To wit:

Think of how many men, women, and children would be alive and well today if only Prescott Bush (look him up) had run headlong into an oncoming blimp in 1917.

Tuesday, April 03, 2007

Things that won’t make it into my Ph.D. Dissertation

As part of the larger re-examination of the American experience begun by professional historians in the 1970s and 1980s, scholars attempted to re-conceptionalize the “winning of the west” as a not particularly romantic period of resource extraction and industrialization. Such potent scholars have successfully (or at least to the satisfaction of the intellectual establishment) debunked the idea that there was anything romantic, heroic, or even very interesting about the Old West of the cowboy and the range war.

The question, though, particularly for the individual who has an emotional connection with the West, is whether the New Western Historians have brought such energy to the destruction of the myth of the wild free man of the frontier because the myth is flawed, or because they have a deep and personal distaste for the wild free man unconstrained by the dictates of peer-reviewed journals and departmental policies.

Monday, March 19, 2007

under theorized

Theorization: the process by which the intangible is made indefensible by the insufferable.

ladylike

So I see in the paper that there’s a company that is offering women classes on how to seem “approachable.” It seems that some of them are having trouble finding relationships at least partly because they respond to even the most polite, civil, and courteous men with cutting remarks and chill distain. They are then mystified as to why they don’t get asked out.

I love America.

In what other civilization do you have to teach people that maybe— just maybe— the proper response to the honorable attentions of a gentleman might not be a swift kick in the nuts?

Sorry, sorry, sorry!!!!

...for being gone so long.

Complex state affairs. I'll spare you the grim details. Suffice to say that it involved taxes, my continuing struggles with the Ph.D. program, turning 50, my very first colonscopy (such fun), and driving back from the Bronx to Boston in the middle of an ice storm.

More than fun than bobbing for leeches.

Sunday, January 28, 2007

supply and demand

Here’s something interesting I read in the papers. It seems that according to various studies that corporate profits are up, corporate productivity (i.e., how hard you work) is WAY up, and Wall Street Firms are doing so well that last Christmas’ bonuses for individual traders were in the multi-million dollar range.

BUT, salaries . . . i.e., what you, as opposed to Wall Street brokers, get paid . . . are actually down. You are almost certainly working longer hours for less pay, fewer benefits, and no job security.

Hmmm.

So, let us restate the law of supply and demand. It now reads:

“I, the Wall Street Bigwig, whose ability to forecast the market has been statistically proven to be slightly less good than that of your average chimpanzee, DEMAND that you, who produce everything, SUPPLY me with everything I want, regardless of the fact that I, in turn, produce nothing, and intend to give you just exactly that — nothing! — in return.”

Thursday, January 25, 2007

and I'm still mad about Borat

So I saw in the paper that one of the guys responsible for the “Girls Gone Whoopee” series of video tapes may be going to jail for a while. Seems he didn’t exactly have consent for some of his stars . . . i.e., the under-aged women who got drunk and appeared in his pictures.

Which is fine I suppose. Keeps us on our toes. And Morality is everything. Etc. Etc.

But, still . . .

Let’s see if I’ve got this straight. Get somebody plastered and put them into humiliating situations on film, and call it “Girls Gone Whacko,” then you’re a nasty quasi-pornographer and they take you to court.

But, if you get somebody drunk and put them into humiliating situations on film, and you call it “Borat,” they give you Oscars.

Okay. Just making sure I knew how it worked around here.

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

New Year's Blessing . . . sorta

I’m back from New Mexico, and I’d like to start this year with something of a new tradition. I want to say something. To wit:

To anyone whom I have ever in my life offended or hurt by word or deed or lack of action, I here-by humbly apologize and I hope you will try to forgive me.

To anyone who has ever hurt or offended me by word or deed or lack of action, I will try to forgive you.

And, finally . . .

To the terrorists who have slaughtered thousands in the name of religion, to the men in Washington who lied and slandered their way into office and then launched meaningless and horrible wars, to the party hacks who sent the tanks into Tiananmen . . . I hope you b*stards get brain aneurisms and die.

Sorry. But this Christian forgiveness stuff only goes so far. You know?

Friday, December 29, 2006

Happy New Year . . . and Outta Town

Just fyi.

I’ll be out of town for a week or so. Look for a return of Xcargo around 10 January.

Happy New Year.

Thursday, December 28, 2006

President Ford

President Ford is dead. Let us be saddened. Let us praise a good man.

Let us weep that his like is not to be found in the GOP, much less the White House, today.

Wednesday, December 27, 2006

Merry Xmas #2

And in rather similar terms . . . but on the other side of the fence . . .

I see in the paper that the Christian Right, which has made “keep Christ in Christmas” a major part of its crusade against Liberals, is actually turning a tidy profit from the whole business. It’s selling pins and bumper stickers, as well as raising funds from gullible Church-goers, to defend “Merry Christmas” from “Happy Holidays.” The article I read said that American Family Association alone has taken in $550,000 in “sales of buttons and magnets stamped with the slogan ‘Merry Christmas: It’s Worth Saying.’”

Gosh. Cash and mean-spirited politics.

That’s certainly what I want under my Christmas tree.

Don’t you?





(Source: LA Times, reprinted in Boston Globe, December 24, 2006. P. A13)

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Merry Xmas #1

Last time I wished everyone a “Happy Holiday.” That’s PC-speak for “Merry Christmas.”

Actually, I do have mixed feelings about saying “Merry Christmas” this time of year. On the one hand, I do genuinely understand that it is both unpleasant and intolerant to assume that everyone belongs to the same faith tradition as I.

Yet . . .

And yet . . .

Have you noticed that the people who make the biggest fuss about it are really and truly, deep down, at base, secretly saying something along the lines of “Diversity means that if I celebrate it, it’s good. If you celebrate it, then scr*w you, you vicious Nazi b*stard" ?

Sunday, December 24, 2006

Happy Holidays

Whatever you celebrate this season . . . HAPPY HOLIDAYS!

Friday, December 22, 2006

Separated At Birth?

The scary thing? You know I don’t much care for that Sacha Baron Cohen movie, which I believe is anti-American and bullying to boot.

But, well . . . you know . . . I saw on the web a photo of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad addressing that conference of Holocaust Deniers . . .

Is it just me, or does he look more like Borat with every passing day?

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Seward Collins




Here's my newest adventure in video weirdness. It's a short piece on the chap who is the subject of my most recent book and can be found at Youtube, here:

Youtube Seward Collins

or at the Internet Archive, here:

Internet Archive Collins


cheers

mjt

Friday, December 15, 2006

Alas!

You know the tragic thing? After all the sh*t the neconnies have pulled . . . the slander, the lies, the bullying, the fraudulent impeachment, 9/11, Homeland “Defense,” Iraq, Katrina . . .

The first thing I thought when I heard about poor Senator Tim Johnson’s illness was:

Check his throat for finger prints, ‘cause sure as h*ll they’re gonna be Ch*ney's.

Thursday, December 14, 2006

MBAs

Did you see in the news the other day that some study has shown that MBA students cheat more than another kind?

Gee.

So, let me get this straight. We’ve got a culture which says that winning is the only thing that matters, which teaches that “business ethics” are a contradiction in terms, which points with pride to Enron and sweetheart deals for crony capitalists in Iraq, and which chants “increase shareholder value” like a mantra while at the same time encouraging every CEO to act like a blood-sucking, flesh shredding, sewer shark.

And MBAs cheat in school.

Gosh. Who wudda thunk it?

Sunday, December 10, 2006

watch for

WATCH FOR GRAND RE-OPENING.

Coming soon . . .

Sunday, November 19, 2006

Mo’ Borat

Still, kinda interesting when you think about it.

Borat, a.k.a. Sacha Baron Cohen, makes a film in which he says that all . . . ALL . . . Americans are racist, blood-thirsty, warmongering, anti-Semitic, materialistic, bigoted, brain-dead, Neo-Nazis with big bombs and small wing-wangs . . .

And America . . .

Responds by making his movie number one at the box office.

Whoa.

What’s the line by Yakov Smirnoff? “What a country.”

Saturday, November 18, 2006

Borat the Bully

So, am I the only person on the planet who thinks that the movie Borat is a wretched excuse for entertainment and that Sacha Baron Cohen, the alleged comedian who plays the title role, is a bully and a moralizing, anti-American prig who should suffer extreme civil penalties for invasion of privacy?

Uh . . . anyone . . . out there?

Maybe it’s just me.

Sigh.

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Election

So we woke up this a.m. to discover that the Democrats had swept the House, made big gains in the Senate, and dominated many local elections. In fact, the word “landslide” comes to mind.

That’s a LOT of votes. And most of ‘em, at least, even got recorded. Hanging chads, “lost” ballots, intimidation of voters by neocon bully-boys, fraudulent recounts . . . all (mostly) missing from the scene.

Gosh. Has anybody checked? I mean, Karl Rove is all right, isn’t he? Not sick or anything?

Saturday, October 28, 2006

Mutant Pomeranians

Have you noticed that I have stopped referring to “Republicans” when I talk about the current administration? There is a good reason for that. Near as I can tell, the Bushies aren’t Republicans. They spend where the Republicans would save, interfere when Republicans would leave damn well enough alone, and rush in where Republicans would dash the other way.

In fact, come right down to it, a Republican is to a Bushie what Hello Kitty is a to a three eyed mutant giant Pomeranian with rabies and a side order of halitosis.

And that’s on a good day.

Thursday, October 19, 2006

A little history

So, a little history: as the Roman Empire entered its final days, the leadership elite managed to largely exempt itself from any form of taxation while at the same time shifting the ever increasing costs of civil administration and defense to a peasantry (in effect, the middle class) that was already stretched to the breaking point. Then, too, to damper down social unrest, the same elite turned to religion as a means of social control, which is how Christianity eventually emerged as the Roman State religion, though only after the Empire had experimented with several other options, including a cult of the Invincible Sun. And, finally, to deal more with internal threats than external, the elite moved to increasingly militarize that state, so that in the end Emperors paraded about in military attire even when they, themselves, had never gotten closer to a battle than watching gladiators making each other into chopped liver on Sundays.

So, let’s sum up, shall we? A decaying social order in which the poor pay the expenses of the rich, the state is propped up by increasingly intolerant cults, and the commander-in-chief staggers about in helmet and gear that do not fit him.

Hmmm.

Why does that sound familiar?

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

Lesser of Two . . .

You know, much as I detest the Bushies, I gotta confess. I don’t see anybody else out there that’s has much to offer.

I mean, come on, the Democrats haven’t had a good idea since Truman dropkicked MacArthur’s Pyongyang outta Korea.

Monday, October 16, 2006

Oh me of little faith

Another cheery religious news day today . . . with the papers full of stories of people blowing themselves and other people up in the name of God . . . abusing alter boys in the name of God . . . running TV scams that bilk little old ladies out of Social Security checks in the name of God . . . voting for Right Wing psychopaths in the name of God . . . and so on.

You know, after much thought, here’s my take on faith.

Given a choice between it and good douse of doubt, I’ll take the doubt.

You’re more likely to survive it.

Saturday, October 14, 2006

WMDs

So, I see now that there’s some dispute about the North Korean nuclear test. Some specialists are saying that the blast was neither as big nor as destructive as the North Koreans said it was.

Gee . . .lying about weapons of mass destructions (WMDs).

Wonder who they could have learned that from.

Wednesday, October 11, 2006

More on North K. Nukes

You know the tragic thing? I mean, the REALLY sad thing?

After all the lies and falsehoods the Bushites have shoveled at us . . . after all the things they’ve done that were immoral, illegal, unethical, and just plain wrong . . . after all the swift-boating and corruption and K-streeting . . .

The first thing I thought when I heard about the North Korean nuke was:

“Gee, how conveniently close to November.”

Monday, October 09, 2006

North Korean Fall-Out

North Korea has finally gone ahead and built and detonated a Bomb...

Here’s some history. The Clinton Administration’s patient diplomacy had largely pulled the fangs of the North Korean nuke program. The North Koreans had demilitarized their reactors and allowed inspectors and cameras into their facilities.

But, that was under that wimpy Clinton and his spineless liberals. Along comes the Bush II regime of good, muscular, tough-minded neocons and Real Men, like Condi. And none of that pussy footing around for them. No Sir! With them we get an aggressive, hard nosed, two fisted foreign policy. You betcha!

And so, now, we’ve got fall-out in South East Asia and every nation in the region gearing up for war.

Gosh.

And people say there’s no such thing as progress.

Friday, October 06, 2006

Our Choice

Periodically, nations decide who they wish to be.

In the 1860s, for instance, the United States decided (via force of arms) that it would not be a country of planters in a semi-feudal agricultural economy. Rather, it would be an industrial, bourgeois, classical liberal, free labor society with all the good and ill that entails. By like token, in the 1940s and ‘40s, many European nations struggled with the question of whether they wished to be empires, with potent overtones of fascism, or modern states. With one or two exceptions, they choose to be states, again for good or ill.

I think that today, the United States faces a similar choice. The next elections will determine whether we, as a people, wish to be the inhabitants of an America which embodies the best ideals of the Founding Fathers . . . of reason, and humanity, and tolerance . . . or which is, instead, the America of this Administration.

That is to say, a plutocratic theocracy headed by hypocrites, thieves, and bullies.

Thursday, October 05, 2006

and still more on $2 billion

And MORE on $2 billion . . .

But, of course, there’s no way around it, really. No matter what hard things I say about the Left, it was the Right (or, Bush-Right) that got us into this mess. Despite all the propaganda and disinformation, the smear jobs and the Swift-Boating, the spin and the distortions and the flag-wrapping . . .it was the Right, the Bushies, who got us into Iraq with a collection of bald face lies about WMDs, who fought the war on the cheap and so put American soldiers into peril, who have been so focused on the oil fields of the Arab world that they are now failing to notice that the real authors of 9-11 are happily re-conquering Afghanistan, and, oh yes, who have not yet managed to find much less kill or capture Ben Laden.

So, about that “mission accomplished” thing . . .

If this is Bushies’ idea of triumph, then Good God save me from ever seeing what they’d call a disaster.

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

on the other hand . . .

More on the $2 billion dollars a day . . .

By an interesting coincidence, a column in the June 2006 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN noted that the current cost of petrol refinery is about $2 billion. So, in other words, every day that passes that we have an Army hostage in Iraq we spend the cash which might otherwise have gone to the cost of constructing the sort of industrial infrastructure which could save us from price hikes and fuel shortages.

But, just to show I’m detestable to everyone . . . Right, Left, and Center . . .

We COULD have spent that $60 billion a month on 30 new refineries, but according ot the article in the SCI-AM, we wouldn’t have, because good and proper environmentalists, tree huggers, bird h*mpers, and not-in-my-backyarders have managed to make it impossible for refineries to be built in this country since 1970 or there’s about—which, by the way, is one of the reasons why when Katrina hit the Gulf Coast gasoline prices went up like a sky rocket on helium on a day without gravity. A big chunk of our existing refineries, you see, went off line, and we didn’t have anything to take up the slack.

Ah, the joy of it . . .

The Right spends us into to poor house, and the Left locks the door so we can’t get out once we’re there.

Monday, October 02, 2006

$2,000,000,000 A Day

So I saw on the Web the other day that, by some measures, we are now spending $2 billion a day in Iraq.

That’s $2 BILLION . . . or $2,000,000,000 . . . every damn DAY. Or, $14 billion a week. Or $60 billion every month.

You know, I gotta admit, the Bush administration is efficient.

I mean, when I was a boy, we used to say that whenever you got Republicans into the White House, they’d “fiscal responsible” (new verb) us into a Depression. And whenever you got Democrats there, they’d moralize us into a War.

However, with the Bushies . . .

They’ve managed to do both at the same time.

Now THAT’S efficiency.

Friday, September 29, 2006

The aardvark, the wombat, and Dick Cheney.

The aardvark, the wombat, and Dick Cheney.

All proof positive that the Creator finished inventing Cannabis before he got to vertebrates.

Thursday, September 28, 2006

JJ from 'ell

J.J. Bittermuch, the world’s angriest man, writes me from the fifth circle (the Wraithful) of Hell:

“The smug woman says, ‘The more I see men, the more I love my dog.’

“I reply, ‘And I thank your poodle for removing you from the gene pool.’”

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Definition

Abstraction — definition: a moral absolute like “Virtue,” “Greatness,” “National Security”, “Race,” and so on, which allows us to kill and maim without feeling a twinge of guilt.

See Abscess.

Monday, September 25, 2006

E. Coli

So, people are dropping dead from E. Coli contaminated spinach. Thousands of acres of the crop are being plowed under in a desperate attempt to stop the spread of the disease.

Of course, if we’d adopted a program of sanitizing food by means of low level irradiation, the way we wanted to you a few years back, all of this could have avoided.

But, you see, radiation is “bad.” And Those Who Knew Best protested and jumped up and down and said “Three Mile Island” and claimed that we were all gonna turn into mutant freaks with two eyes and three heads. So, we didn’t do it.

Now, we’ve got dead people and a ruined industry.

Don’t you just love People Who Know Best? Who are On The Side of the Angels? And who will Save Us From Ourselves?

Say, I got an idea. Most of ‘em are Vegetarians. Many of ‘em are Vegans. So, they wouldn’t object to eating nothing but spinach for a few decades.

It would save the spinach industry. Take care of all these rotting vegetables. And best of all, provide nice snug homes for all those poor, dispossessed E. Coli.

How could anyone in league with Angels possibly object?

Friday, September 22, 2006

Pre-Texting

So, as I read in the papers, it seems that HP has been accused of “pre-texting” – i.e., gathering private information on its critics and the press.

Gosh.

So let me get this straight. We have an enormous, multinational corporation in a Bushite-Reaganoid age when “share holder value” is a religious mantra while “regulation” is a swear word, and its crewed by MBAs who’ve been trained from birth to win at ANY cost, and who believe as God is their witness that “business ethics” means disembowel the other guy before he can get you first . . .

And then it spies on its enemies . . .

And we’re gonna pretend that we’re surprised?

Thursday, September 21, 2006

ABD?

By the way, since I’ve passed my oral exam, I’m now known as “All But Dissertation.”

That’s ABD for short.

Hmmm.

Sounds a bit like a personality disorder, doesn’t it?

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

foul mouthed

Hard to discuss my education in polite conversation. How do you say “I’ve passed my orals” without sounding like out of a South Park episode?

Monday, September 18, 2006

I passed.

Well, you ask yourself, where the ‘ell is ole Michael Jay?

Answer: I’ve been getting ready for my Ph.D. oral exam. You see, after about 20 years in the trade press, I woke up and realized that if I wrote one more article about disk drives, I was gonna kill somebody. So, I went back to school to get a degree or two in history.

The oral exam was in some ways the capstone of the whole effort. The dissertation is still out there to be written, of course, but, still, the exam was the real biggie. It was the thing which could have reduced all my efforts to naught in an afternoon.

The exam was last week.

To my surprise, I passed. The committee even said my answers almost made sense. Tragic, really. Clearly, the whole bunch must have been drinking heavily since breakfast. Remind me to send them those flyers from AA, won’t you?

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

Quacks like a rhino

Republican pundits are making a great deal over the Dem’s use of the term “culture of corruption” to describe the Bushite Administration. They say it’s propaganda and unjust. But, then, after the all the proonhockey the GOP sleeze-meisters spewed out during the Clinton years, they aren’t exactly in the tossing stones category.

But, more to the point . . . a culture of corruption? Well, now, let’s see . . . DeLay, no-bid contracts in Iraq, a more or less overt attempt to turn New Orleans into a whites-only theme park, the K-street project . . .

Hmm.

You know the old saying about quacking like and walking like and its probably not a rhinoceros?

Friday, July 28, 2006

The perfect soluton

Say, just fyi, I’ve come up with the perfect solution for the current crisis in the Middle East (and everywhere else).

We take the whole state of Israel and move it to an island in the Pacific. Then we build a 300 meter tall concrete wall around the Arab world plus Iran and Afghanistan (think the Hoover dam on steroids). Then we collect up the Neocons, the Religious Right, the Bush Administration, radio talk show hosts, Islamic Fundamentalists, North Korean Communists, Latin American Drug Kingpins, serial killers, and people who talk loudly on cell phones in restaurants, and send them to someplace far, far away. Pluto, maybe.

They’ll be so happy together. Among their own kind.

The more things change

Hmm. Let’s see. Since last I posted we’ve had war, death, destruction, chaos, corruption, the more or less open Fascistization of the White House, a killer heat wave, threats of a bird flu pandemic, missiles and nukes in the hands of unstable nations, gas at four bucks a gallon, and, oh, yes, American Idol is top of the charts.

Gee.

Glad to know that things are the same ‘round here. Hate to think I’d missed something important.

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

Sorry, Sorry, So sorry . . .

Sorry . . . SO sorry . . . I've not posted in like, forever. Slight case of too many things hitting the fan when the fan was rotating at warp speed. Think splatter. Big league.

But, I promise, I'll soon be back and running. Or posting, anyway.

Really.

mjt

Wednesday, May 24, 2006

Damned if we Do and Da . . . oh, hell, you know the rest

So, now that the Bushits have got into this war in Iraq, what are our options?

Well, number one, we could Hang Tough, Stay The Course, and remain in the country till Mission Accomplished . . . which means that lots of Americans and lots and lots of Iraqis will keep getting killed while we’re in the middle of a covert civil war and every crackpot terrorist in the known universe targets America, and, oh, yes, there’s no oil coming out of Iraq to fuel our nice shiny new hummers.

Hmm. That’s pretty ugly. So . . .

Option two, we End The War, Pull Out, and Bring Our Boys (and Girls) Home . . . and, that means there’s an overt civil war, lots and lots and lots of Iraqis get slaughtered, every crackpot terrorist in the known universe learns that if you just kill enough Americans then the country caves, which means a bunch of us get killed, too, and, oh, yes, there’s no oil coming out of Iraq to fuel our nice shiny new Hummers.

Uh . . .

Say, would someone please stand up and let me know which one of these is the lesser of two evils? I’m having a hard time figuring it out.

Thursday, May 04, 2006

What they've done to Chirstianity

I go to church regularly. One of my better friends is a minister. And yet . . .

Today I heard that among the witnesses at the Enron Trial was a professor from Texas Christian University. He seemed reasonable and learned. But, you know what?

After Bush, after Tom Delay, after Pat Robertson, after the Religious Right, after the invasion of Iraq, after the pedophile scandal in the Church, after the bombings of abortion clinics, after attempts to impose Creationism on public schools, after . . . well, after everything . . .

The very first thing I thought was: How could anyone take seriously a witness from an institution with “Christian” and “Texas” in its name?

Saturday, April 22, 2006

new blog

For those who might be interested, I've set up a new blog devoted to my video experiments. It is:

http://michaeljayvideo.blogspot.com/

cheers

mjt

Starr System

Speaking of Ken Starr (remember him?) there was another piece in the paper this morning that interested me. It seems that state prosecutors are notoriously underpaid. Thus, many of them have to take second jobs (the paper mentioned one who was a dance instructor, another who worked for a funeral home) just to make ends meet.

Now, this is significant, for you will recall that state prosecutors are the people responsible for convicting murderers and rapists. But, them, we don’t pay.

Meanwhile, how many million dollars was it that Ken Starr blew through in an attempt to prove there was a stain on a blue dress . . .?

So, I guess . . . when the GOP talks about “law and order” . . . it means defending Dacron everywhere.

Moral Authority

The paper this morning was a cheery thing. Just chock-o-block full of stories of pedophiles protected and sheltered by the Church, a Priest accused of being a member of sex ring which exploited women and children and who later murdered a nun in a particularly horrible way, and the Vatican continuing to oppose condom use even in the face of AIDS.

And these are the people who think they have the moral authority to tell us how to live our lives.

Come again?

That’s like Ken Starr lecturing on judicial ethics.

Friday, April 21, 2006

a video experiment


Something different today. I've been experimenting with video. Pretty creepy stuff. I like it.

Go Here to see.

Tuesday, April 18, 2006

once more, uncalled for

The thing to remember about the people who put Bush into office, and keep him there, is that a big chunk of them really and truly, as God is their witness, believe that Jesus was blonde, Jews worship Satan, and anyone who can read a whole comic strip in a single sitting without moving their lips is most likely a Communist.

Monday, April 10, 2006

ah, sh*t

Jeez, but the Left irritates me. I’m supposed to be a Leftie . . . or at least that’s what hyperventilating libertarians tell me when I suggest that just maybe we could use public schools and state roads . . . but, you know, sometimes . . . all the same . . .

Like for instance:

I see in the paper that the plumbers’ union in Philadelphia has come down with a Diktat against waterless urinals because it means fewer bribes for organized crim- . . .er, I mean, less work for the guild. And the union leadership’s gotten pretty darn fierce about it.

Which means, of course, the union has handed a nearly perfect weapon to its own enemies, and at this very moment the Greens who ought to be the plumbers’ natural allies are staring in aghast horror and thinking about all those millions of gallons of clean water that COULD have been saved but won’t be . . . and Right-wing Pundits are jumping up and down and saying “See? See? We told you they were a threat to everything pure and beautiful.”

So, note to the union:

Gee, Guys, why don’t you just to shoot yourself in the head? Be a lot quicker.

Wednesday, April 05, 2006

Delay Departs

So Tom “The Hammer” Delay is gone. That’s a good thing.

But, come on, let’s face it. Not much is going to change.

At least, not until somebody on the side of the angels learns to be even meaner ‘n he was.

Monday, April 03, 2006

seduced necons

You may have noticed that I haven’t been saying as many nasty things about Neoconservatives lately. There is a good reason for this. Lately, some of the better sort of Neocon intellectuals have been bailing out of the Bush camp. You see, they noticed this little fact that they were being used by the W. Bushies to provide intellectual cover for some d*mn dumbest decisions yet made by human beings in elective office and now they’re basically being hung out to dry. They were, in other words, seduced and abandoned.

Or, rather more precisely, they got scr*wed.

And they didn’t even get dinner first.

Sunday, April 02, 2006


Altar Boys: take two

So, a certain large Church, which shall remain nameless, has launched an effort to drive gay people from its ranks. This Church has said they are “immoral.”

This, you understand, is after the same Church played “hide the pedophile” for several decades.

It is for this reason that I’ve begun experimenting with the art of collage. One of my little works is pasted here.

Seems fitting, don’t you think?

Friday, March 31, 2006

a completely uncalled for remark

The Feminist says “If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.” She is, of course, quite wrong.

Now, if altar boys could knock-up bishops . . .that would be another story entirely.

how it works

Okay, let me get this straight. Clinton didn’t nuke Beijing, so the Bushites said he was a traitor and a wimp and probably had a six Chinese trans-gendered hookers chained to the wall in the Lincoln bedroom.

Now, W. Bush is asleep at the switch when Islam-o-Nazis fly airplanes into New York and DC, then lets Bennie Laydown escape, then invades the wrong country with too few people . . . and then he wanted to sell at least three ports to Arab nations which might happen to have close connections to the very same chaps who’d like to ship WMDs in container ships into the country.

And people say he’s a Patriot.

Okay. Fine.

Just trying to figure out how it works around here.

sorry to be quiet for so long

Sorry I’ve quiet for so long. It’s just that . . . well . . .you know . . . it’s hard to write anything that’ll get a chuckle about current politics. I mean, really, compared to master comedians like Bush and his analogs in the DNC, I’m just not even in the same league.

Monday, February 20, 2006

On Noble Ideals

Ideal — definition, an ennobling and enlightening concept which exists in the ephemeral to thus justify our doing terrible things to people in the material. See Liberation, Peace & Justice, etc.

Sunday, February 19, 2006

The Slime

You know, I haven’t written much about Dickie (“Quick-Draw”) Cheney and his fun little gun. Mostly that’s because, at first, I thought it was just an accident and a personal tragedy.

Yet, with the passing of time, that’s gotten harder to believe. We have discovered that there were so many lies and evasions . . .

And, you know, I can’t help thinking, you remember back when President Clinton’s secretary of commerce, Ron Brown, was killed in a plane crash — which was, gawdamit, an accident — and almost instantly all the Neocon GOP slime spreaders came out from under their rocks to tell the world that he’d been assassinated?

Well, imagine, just imagine what would have happened . . . the stories, the falsehoods, the dis-information, the smear job up the wazoo . . . that we’d be living with now if Cheney had been a Democrat.

Saturday, February 11, 2006

Search Engine Boogie

So the Feds want all the search engines, like Google, to provide the details of anyone who looks for illegal stuff. But, not to worry — the Feds tell us — we’re only looking for perverts, child pornographers, and terrorists.

Well . . . them . . . plus ACLU members, people who voted for Gore, New Orleans residents who aren’t thrilled with FEMA, Blue State citizens, critics of the war in Iraq, and anyone who has ever vaguely suspected that Karl Rove looks lot like a warthog with a glandular problem.

But, hey! Six of one, half a dozen . . .

Friday, February 10, 2006

Those Cartoons

So, like most of us, I’ve been watching the riots in Islamic countries about those rather vile cartoons published in Denmark.

And, like most of us, I get all huffy about freedom of speech, and freedom of the press, and, besides, maybe we in the West would be a little less eager to print pictures of the Prophet with a bomb on his head if maybe his followers had declined, at least once in a while, not to blow us and each other up at regular intervals for about the last half century.

But, that said . . . given the realities of modern international strife . . . and all those hyperventilating mobs in places like Teheran . . . and everything . . . well . . .

Note to the Danish Press: If you really wanted to commit hari kari, couldn’t you have stayed at home and shot yourself in the head? Would have been a lot quicker.

Thursday, February 09, 2006

Knight Mare

J.J. Bittermuch writes me from the fifth circle (the Wraithful) of Hell:

In Boston there’s a local publication that covers the night-life and café scene. In a recent issue, the publication printed the results of an informal survey of women asking if chivalry was dead. The general opinion was that it was not only dead but dang near starting to draw flies.

One typical comment from an interviewee was “Although [we are] independent, equal, and fabulous, we still deserve to be treated like ladies. Pay for my meal, open my door, pull out my chair, damn it.”

Fascinating. A total crock of hairy quadruped excrement, but fascinating.

Look, Lady, and I use the term loosely, most men of the last few generations grew up listening to Feminists define all men as pigs and all sex as rape. We listened while women announced that the Y-chromosome was a sexually transmitted disease. We were there while female academics proclaimed us the children of Cain. We watched while women announced that every male was, at best, an impotent sit-com daddy, and at worst, an animal.

And now you have the brass-plated chutzpah to demand that we treat you like a fairy tale princess?

Whoa.

Listen, redefine me . . . at least a little, at least once in a while . . . as Saint George rather than the Dragon, and then maybe we can talk about the shining armor.

Until then . . . well . . .

Galahad has left the building.

Sunday, February 05, 2006

Rolling Stones of the Union

So I watched the State of the Union thing the other night. In it, our fearless leader said we were addicted to oil and needed to mend our ways.

Truth enough, but, you know . . .

This is an administration which is so wired into the oil industry that you can’t figure out where the pipeline leaves off and Cheney’s pacemaker picks up.

And these guys are telling us to consume less?

Come on, that’s like Keith Richards passing out DARE stickers.